News 
 Opinion 
 Editorial 
 General 
 Australia's job is to keep China on the carbon leash 

Australia's job is to keep China on the carbon leash

15/07/2008 10:31:00 PM
WE are in dynamic times when it comes to global energy needs and how those needs are to be met.

On one hand we are witnessing a growing effort to find alternative, renewable forms of energy which emit no or relatively few greenhouse gas emissions.

And on the other the world's energy needs are growing at an extraordinary pace and being satisfied to a large degree through the burning of coal, a great producer of carbon.

This appears to suit our federal and state governments who are earnestly talking about and investing in the capture and storage of carbon.

For those who are sceptical of "burying" the greenhouse gas problem, the massive investment in carbon storage is a great leap backwards.

The two different energy pathways are neatly illustrated by research being conducted in the South Australian outback.

One company is looking at using hot rocks to create steam to move an electricity-generating turbine.

Another company was yesterday talking excitedly about a promising shale oil deposit, said to have the potential to yield significant quantities of synthetic crude oil or gas.

The outback has never been such a busy place.

Also yesterday came news that the Queensland Government is contemplating the construction of a new coal port between Rockhampton and Mackay that could boost coal exports by 40 per cent.

The coal is coming from the Bowen, Galilee and Surat coal basins which could yield tens of millions of tonnes of coal annually.

Clearly Australia's love affair with coal is not ending any time soon.

Nor is China's.

The export of coal brings with it a responsibility to help deal with its emissions once the coal is burnt, in much the same way that we are increasingly demanding that manufacturers and retailers take responsibility for their products once they have been expended.

With that in mind the message from visiting American researcher Professor Jeffrey Sachs from the Earth Institute at Columbia University is particularly pertinent.

Prof Sachs has said Australia's close ties with China place it in a position to encourage the world's most popular country to reduce its carbon emissions.

What Prof Sachs also suggests is that Australia should develop a detailed vision of what its energy sources in 20 to 30 years' time will be.

That is an insight into a future that we have seen little of so far.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


There are plenty of reasons why we shouldn’t be developing shale oil. The production of shale oil is highly greenhouse polluting, up to almost four times worse than normal oil. Yet the CSIRO say we need to reduce Australia's greenhouse emissions by 60-80% by 2050 if we are going to stop dangerous climate change, such as devastating coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef and a major increase in the frequency and intensity of droughts. However, there is so much shale oil that, even if its greenhouse pollution could be reduced to the same level as normal oil, which seems unlikely given its high starting point, developing it would still increase Australia's greenhouse emissions by nearly 200%. There are many other problems with shale oil as well. The last attempt to develop shale oil in Australia - the Stuart Project near Gladstone - shut down in 2004 because of endless technical, commercial and environmental problems. It was more than $130 million over budget and had never made a profit despite Government subsidies of nearly $55 for every barrel of oil it produced. Air emissions from the plant repeatedly made local people sick, leading Queensland Health to describe the plant as "a public health nuisance" and the two local councils to oppose its planned expansion. A full-scale plant would have used nearly 30% of Gladstone's total water demand or almost twice as much as all residential and commercial demand combined. Developing shale oil would lock us into an environmentally damaging and greenhouse polluting future at the very time we need to be investing our efforts into clean renewable fuels.
Posted by Gareth Walton on 2/08/2008 4:27:23 PM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

19/08/2008 | The great thing about yesterday’s women’s triathlon was the heartfelt congratulations Emma Snowsill, Vanessa Fernandes and Emma Moffatt showed each other after the event.
Online Personnel
 
McCain
 
RegionalOne Credit Union
 
Eclipse Ford
 
The Courier - McDonalds Online Footy Tipping Comp
 
University of Ballarat
 
MyCareer
 
Domain.com.au